Thursday, 7 May 2009
YOU MUST BE FUCKING JOKING, REVISITED
In a puff in the Guardian, Russian gangster’s moll, George YachtMan, squeaks that the Bullingdon BullyBoys – and Teresa Shoes - are on the case, asking a bunch of parasite, layabout fuckwits to devise new ways of government shitting in our faces.
Ask yourself three questions, pipes the impertinent little nobody - to which the answers are, presumably: himself, Dave Charlie and Ken Lung Cancer - before listing some of the ways in which the NewTories are getting their shit together.
“We are working with Harvard Professor Ken Rogoff and Sir Alan Budd to create a new independent office for budget responsibility.”
Wow, really ? Fuck me.
“It is Conservatives who are working with the world's leading behavioural economists and social psychologists, including Richard Thaler and Robert Cialdini, to develop policies based on new evidence about how people really behave.”
Behavioural economists and social pscholigists? You're shitting me, right?
“I'm confident Demos will help us with these questions, alongside other leading thinktanks we work with.”
Government by thinktank, that’s what we want, George, some more of that shit.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Sir, you have entirely failed to grasp the consensus-shaping, paradigm-shifting, nay, epoch shaking significance of the methodologies currently taking shape by way of the steady hand and contemplative gaze of the Blessed in Blue.
It will surely not be long before the proposed admixture of inept pop-psyche clichés, hackneyed alliterative slogans and rutting avarice transforms Ruin for All into prosperity for a handful.
What then of your cynicism dear Sir?
p.s. is that tree meant to look like piss or what?
I question Mr, Mrs or Miss Void's sincerity. A slight hint of sarcasm seems to hang upon their words.
I've kinda avoided this illuminati shit but I don't blame anyone for thinking the FED's an unmitigated piece of shit. I guess it's good that Blighty, in that famous novelists word, are a bunch of paki shopkeepers - so have bugger all to lose unlike Yankie dingle dandies with small and irrelevant car firms.
Sorry, must have struck the wrong tone. It was a send up.
I'd hoped to convey unqualified support of Mr Ishmael's position, albeit in the form of a hopelessly self-defeating counter-argument.
How does the Illuminati/FED apply? Blessed in Blue was a reference to the Tories, not the Yanks - you might have just Rorschach'd yourself there!
Post a Comment