ANDREW HAIR-TRANSPLANT.
SEE HIM WHIP THE WOMEN, JUST AROUND MIDNIGHT.
I try to avoid stepping in this shit but I'm having to limit my movement for a while and the other night I couldn't find the remote control - or the remote, as we call it in word-saving Britain, it's as though words cost money, the number of them we try to save. As adjective becomes noun, we all conscientiously save using the word "phone," Christ, such an effort it is, saying phone, and we gleefully and obediently cull these wasteful words even though we refer, in any event, not to a mobile phone, but to a portable one, the mobile telephone has no mobility but that doesn't matter a fuck, does it, it's all bollocks, modern Britain, texting bollocks and twittering cunts everywhere you look - anyway, I was kinda stuck, watching the grotesque, suppurating arsehole, Andrew Hair-Transpant bullying his ancient way through another week of tripe.
The hypocrisy - not to mention the arse-numbing stupidity - of Diane Lard is stupefying; more proof, if it were needed, of the garbage first and second-class honoured from Oxbridge, Lard cannot frame a sentence and communicates in a sequence of shrill malcontentments, amplified by thrusting palms and pointing fingers seeking to impose silence upon those bewildered by her shitheaded stupidity.
From the Daily Filth.
The standards committee's findings, seen by the Daily Mail, are critical of the makers of This Week, saying that 'Abbott's appearances on the programme since becoming a shadow minister had been too frequent'.
The committee added that paying Miss Abbott, who earned between £839 and £869 per edition, 'such substantial appearance fees since she took up her front bench position in 2010 was a breach of the guidelines'.
The complaint dates back to January when crossbench peer Lord Laird wrote to BBC Director-General Mark Thompson arguing it was wrong that, as a shadow minister, Miss Abbott should 'profit financially' via the BBC licence fee for expressing political opinions and discussing Labour policy as a pundit on the programme, hosted by Andrew Neil.
Even so, the fact that Lard is an obnoxious, troughing bully, herself, doesn't mean that Andrew Jock should be licensed to bully her, on his joke politics show, implicity bullying her on behalf of us.. On this occasion he read to his bloated victim a piece written by the hideous Mrs Michael Gove-Spit of the Daily Filth, damning those who paid for their child's private education, those, in short, like Abbott.
Abbott, with her own privately educated child.
Despite a face like icy thunder Diane wasn't able to respond to Neil's relentless, coarse goading. It would've been acceptable for a decent person to tax her about her infamous hypocrisy - whoring a living from the poorest constituency in the country whilst sending her own brat away for Money's dark tuition - but Neil is such a piece of shit - the PBC's in-house Kelvin McKenzie, that, like mrs narcolept feeling the anguish of Gordon Snot, one almost felt for her. But not quite.
Neil has succeeded in persuading us that he is Everyman's journalist. he's actually nothing of the sort and thirty years ago he should have been standing where Rebekah Brooks and her gang stand now; Neil, it was, who first opened his whoremouth for Rupert Murdoch's septic media cock and its diseased pissing all over Decency. Neil's subsequent greedy, hypocritical unprincipled career - see his wiki rapsheet - has seen him become the Beeb's go-to political hack, much as Sir Jimmy Savile was its go-to charity worker. An' howsaboutthat then, nighty-night and don't let the PaedoChannel bite.
It is Abbott's own greed and vanity which puts her in Neil's firing line, just as it is with Tory thug Michael Portillo - Oh, I think he is here for the money, sneered Andy in the same grim show - so maybe we should have no sympathy for them,
or for that other prat, Johnson, the singing, cuckolded postman. It is not, though, a sympathy which I feel for this trio of filthsters but a sympathy for Decency's boundaries, so regularly trampled by Glasgow's finest.
Oh but mr ishmael, he really has a go at the politicians, they're scared of him, he holds them to account. Aye, that's why they queue-up to be on his miserable fucking excuse of a Daily Politics show, to be held to account. Ah, so.
The hypocrisy - not to mention the arse-numbing stupidity - of Diane Lard is stupefying; more proof, if it were needed, of the garbage first and second-class honoured from Oxbridge, Lard cannot frame a sentence and communicates in a sequence of shrill malcontentments, amplified by thrusting palms and pointing fingers seeking to impose silence upon those bewildered by her shitheaded stupidity.
The standards committee's findings, seen by the Daily Mail, are critical of the makers of This Week, saying that 'Abbott's appearances on the programme since becoming a shadow minister had been too frequent'.
The committee added that paying Miss Abbott, who earned between £839 and £869 per edition, 'such substantial appearance fees since she took up her front bench position in 2010 was a breach of the guidelines'.
The complaint dates back to January when crossbench peer Lord Laird wrote to BBC Director-General Mark Thompson arguing it was wrong that, as a shadow minister, Miss Abbott should 'profit financially' via the BBC licence fee for expressing political opinions and discussing Labour policy as a pundit on the programme, hosted by Andrew Neil.
Even so, the fact that Lard is an obnoxious, troughing bully, herself, doesn't mean that Andrew Jock should be licensed to bully her, on his joke politics show, implicity bullying her on behalf of us.. On this occasion he read to his bloated victim a piece written by the hideous Mrs Michael Gove-Spit of the Daily Filth, damning those who paid for their child's private education, those, in short, like Abbott.
Abbott, with her own privately educated child.
Despite a face like icy thunder Diane wasn't able to respond to Neil's relentless, coarse goading. It would've been acceptable for a decent person to tax her about her infamous hypocrisy - whoring a living from the poorest constituency in the country whilst sending her own brat away for Money's dark tuition - but Neil is such a piece of shit - the PBC's in-house Kelvin McKenzie, that, like mrs narcolept feeling the anguish of Gordon Snot, one almost felt for her. But not quite.
Neil has succeeded in persuading us that he is Everyman's journalist. he's actually nothing of the sort and thirty years ago he should have been standing where Rebekah Brooks and her gang stand now; Neil, it was, who first opened his whoremouth for Rupert Murdoch's septic media cock and its diseased pissing all over Decency. Neil's subsequent greedy, hypocritical unprincipled career - see his wiki rapsheet - has seen him become the Beeb's go-to political hack, much as Sir Jimmy Savile was its go-to charity worker. An' howsaboutthat then, nighty-night and don't let the PaedoChannel bite.
It is Abbott's own greed and vanity which puts her in Neil's firing line, just as it is with Tory thug Michael Portillo - Oh, I think he is here for the money, sneered Andy in the same grim show - so maybe we should have no sympathy for them,
or for that other prat, Johnson, the singing, cuckolded postman. It is not, though, a sympathy which I feel for this trio of filthsters but a sympathy for Decency's boundaries, so regularly trampled by Glasgow's finest.
Oh but mr ishmael, he really has a go at the politicians, they're scared of him, he holds them to account. Aye, that's why they queue-up to be on his miserable fucking excuse of a Daily Politics show, to be held to account. Ah, so.
16 comments:
" held to account "
One "C" too many and one surplus " 0 ".
I was at a private function (bankers & venture capitalists) in London around the year 2000 and Neil was guest speaker. He was over-suited and over-coiffured in a David Steel sort of way. Totty seemed drawn to him, and as a bit of a drinker myself, I can spot another, and he looked 3-parts gone. So I stayed for his talk thinking it could be fun.
Well, he gave a most impressive speech, word perfect, no POTUS Autoque he (he referred occaisionally to notes). It was well researched (maybe not by him, but credit for him having good assistants), witty when required. He may be a cunt, but he's not A stupid cunt. He certainly impressed an othewise hard-nosed bunch of bastards in the audience, who gave him a warm round of applause.
I'm sure his telly stuff is, as you would say Mr I, just showbusiness.
"it is abbott's own greed and vanity which puts her in neil's firing line...
now now...that's no way to talk about your mum, mr ishmael...
...but i have to say it's just so sweet the way you have put aside domestic political differences here and selflessly galloped to her defence regardless, chivalrous indeed...
real cute piccy of you too.
ahhhh...
was that your first party conference, babes?
right now, listen here my boy - i know she's a bamba old batty-axe, but no more slagging-off your poor old ma, ok...
...you're not too young to put over my knee for a damn good tanning t'rass
err...i meant "too old"
Tony Benn = Cunt. Message of the day. Awesome campaigner, bit of a dangerous menace. Ah, the 70's - where an honest perv could get promoted!
I totally respect union bashing fir guys like benn & crow because buildings were built for them. I'm just another Tory with good music taste and verbals needs good architecture. Kinda obvious.
Don't know if it's the Daily Angry or Paxman but app he said WW1 poetry is shite and kids these days wouldn't man the trenches. Tit. Royal Navy shot a torpedo into Plymouth harbour today and blew up a wall. This shit kinda writes itself...
i didn't back benn and crow's communist vision of a trade-unionized, nationalized society where we all wind-up in some kind of socialized state-slavery, nevertheless i did respect their general crusade of criticism against establishment neo-colonialism and corruption, especially their humanitarian anti-war stance...
...of course, these guys girded up their principles, marched down to hyde park, jumped up-and-down and railed rotten against bush and blair's war-crimes 'til they were red in the face...
...but then afterwards they all trotted off home and, like good sons of the international imperialist struggle, meekly paid over their income taxes which directly funded the slurry of illegal invasions anyway...
...i'm afraid that ultimately it all amounted to an empty gesture...
...still, i suppose no-one's perfect, we're all just human, and what can any of us really achieve anyway - whether with a fistful of dollars, a fistful of pub peanuts, or a fistful of fuck-all?
were crow and benn's actions as kean as their words, or were their hands dirty with the colour of their dough?
sorry, libel lawyer just phoned - i misspelled my own name, what a cunt.
I briefly tried to watch the programme last night, but it was too painful. I gave up after about three minutes.
I do not feel any sympathy for Abbott and I am furious to find that she gets over £800 for being shouted at by Brillo. It is like watching a staged wrestling match which demonstrates only how much she charges for turning a trick.
And how much are we paying Neil for this? No, don't tell me. I don't want know.
you wouldn't credit-it really, would'ya?
on the one hand we've got lenny emery complaining that there's not enough black people on the bbc...
...and then there's dear old diane abblot blocking out the available air-space so no other fucker can get a bloody look-in...
...and basically, it seems like this...whenever i switch on the box i see diane blaballott - i watch this wank, i see diane perching daintily and demurely on the sofa next to mr lovatory, i watch newslight, i see diane exercizing her democratic right to rabbit, i watch the parliament channel and i see diane working-out her democratic frustrations in the house. yes, i admit i don't watch any other channels or any other programmes, and i only watch these programmes when she's going to be on, but as far as i'm concerned she's wall-to-wall on the television, and it's not like i've got an unhealthy obsession with the woman or anything, just a life-size plastic doll.
ok, yeah - i admit that diane and other afro-caribbeans get quite a lot of air-time on the television...
...you see, errr...it's just they're the wrong type of black.
oh wonderful - i hope you include yourself in that category, len...
...so what precisely's the type you're looking for, then?
just-out-of-college bundles-of-cleavage wearing a mini?
i'll do my best to accommodate you in future, hun.
although there's no doubting that in parliament diane abbott has consistently voted against war, she has nevetheless disgraced herself and let down those she represents by fastidiously neglecting to criticize barack obama's murderous neo-colonialism, which has destroyed countries both in the middle east and africa - if it were still george bush pursuing these policies whilst incumbent in the white house, she would surely have allowed him no place to hide, so i must conclude that she has avoided full-on criticism of obama only because his skin-colour is black. you see, in public, most black people are too scared to protest about obama's criminality, and most white people too ignorant.
the election of president obama, cool, black, charismatic and celebrity-mobbed, was totally disastrous for our youth, black and white, who now believe that personal success is defined by the ability to flaunt and exercise power over others, to intimidate and control those who are weaker - in a subliminal sound-bite, his core message has been that power trumps morality, and we continue to experience the deadly and community-decimating consequences of this on our streets.
president obama, the man who, where there was war, brought more war, and where there was peace, brought back war, has been the worst possible rôle-model for young people - he escalated a merciless western war against tribesmen in afghanistan and pakistan, incited civil-war in libya and syria, then continued a policy of christian-dominated aggressive intervention, begun by president george bush, which has needlessly fuelled unrelenting civil-war in somalia, a country which left-alone had, just a few years back in 2006, chosen peace. moreover, lest-we-forget, president obama has ordered the de facto political assassination of osama bin laden and allowed the mob-execution of colonel gadaffi, both without trial, both in the name of democracy - this is how he has taught our children.
president obama has shown, through his policy of ordering drone-strikes, that he has absolutely no respect for human civilian life.
since the accession of president obama, there has been a concerted attempt to curtail freedom-of-speech, writers and bloggers have been systematically undermined, professionally, socially and domestically, by the obamamaniac fanatics - in some areas this could be done in the name of conservatism or democracy, but in east london is often done in the name of socialism, and for my part i have noticed that the expression of opinions which fall outside of received mainstream left-of-centre thinking is considered tantamount to heresy. the other day, an acquaintance suggested that i should write a book - what a joke, when every key you press on the keyboard is monitored and the information processed and leaked. of course, the local politicians all know exactly what is going-on, but smugly endorse this pattern of control-obsessed behaviour as an unwritten confirmation of their authority.
maybe, just maybe, if children and young adults were allowed to form their own individual views about life instead of being force-fed either the state-school diet of despotism-dressed-as-democracy, or the alternative gridiron gruel of good-old homespun us-'n-them love-thy-label hate-their-label lessons according to labourism, they might just achieve the liberty of learning to intellectualize their problems in order to solve them, without violence rushing to the head first.
the abbotts, hilliers, and lammys of our parliament all fail completely to address the corrupting issue of the trickledown control-culture, which eventually contaminates our homes, our streets, and our communities, but i suppose, in the end, it's a question of fearing the cia, and not wanting to throw stones whilst sitting snug in your own thermostatically-regulated glass house.
i generally agree, the discrimination and prejudice instilled in the labour party easily equals anything exhibited by the conservatives, but i reckon you're not giving credit to the majority of youngsters who develop the individual sense to work out how to tread a path in life without falling into dangerously deep trouble - in any case, regardless of background, we all get into stupid scrapes of some kind at that impressionable age and it's often only luck and a helping hand which enables us to pull ourselves out of it. i dunno about diane abbott, she seemed to vote against intervention in syria on a technicality and not necessarily on the wider principle of opposing neo-colonialism, but having said that, in the event she stood firm on the narrow principle she adopted and probably played skilful politics...
it's all about professional standards in public life, this blog, and regards the performance of people in public office and a few publicly recognized past-it pop-idols - so diane abbott is as accountable as any profiting from the public purse.
once upon a time, i used to work for the government in a very lowly capacity, as an office-monkey, and i did my best to serve the public in a proper and responsible fashion - i paid the visiting public all the expenses to which they were entitled and explained to them in detail the processes and protocols as well as i could, but unfortunately not everyone who works in public offices is even committed to the ethos of public service. these days when i have to attend government offices myself, i still notice the two distinct phenotypes - the public-servants and the public-haters - and in my experience the latter are generally completely untrustworthy sorts in any given situation.
now, in contrast to myself was my close colleague, who, back in those innocent days, i fancy rather modelled herself on the young diane abbott - she used to coarsely burp, fart, and swear, stuffed her face non-stop with food, fucked her way through the entire senior management in the hope of professional advancement, and was in the ingrained habit of being obnoxiously off-hand and rude to the public clients. in fact, this awful, obdurate woman was never at all helpful to members of the public , who oftentimes were obliged to hold the bitch up at gunpoint just to get their bus-fares off her...
...anyhow, as fate would have it, admin officer x found revolutionary politics, and devised a dastardly subversive scheme to bring down the entire british establishment by fiddling her expenses, spending the proceeds on marks and spencers and laura ashley frocks, and then denying all knowledge of anything ever anywhere. of course, inevitably, this intrepid social freedom-fighter was one day caught with her hand in the till and taken to court by the less than amused hierarchy - however, as luck would have it, having studied in great detail some pertinent points of interest relating to her character and personal form, and being further swayed by other relevant features contained within her brief, the judge eventually allowed ms x's exceedingly compelling arguments to appeal to his sense of fair-play, weighed up the wealth of evidence on the balance of probabilities, considered the heavily mitigating circumstances, and in the end she got off on account of her tits being so huge see couldn't see what her hands were doing.
sorry, i was a bit tired and forgot the original prepared ending:
"...balance of probabilities, and in the end she got off on account of the mitigating circumstance of her tits being so huge see couldn't tell what her hands were doing."
explanatory correction two:
"now, in contrast to myself was my close colleague, who, back in those innocent days, i fancy rather modelled herself on the young diane abbott, hailing as she did from a similar background"
sorry, correction of correction:
for 'background' insert 'heritage'.
Post a Comment