Sunday, 10 January 2021

the Sunday Ishmael 10th January 2021

What could possibly go wrong? Here I am, at home, following the guidance. He won't make me cry this time.
You are in the toilet, Matt.
Yes, it's my safe place. Painted in Farrow and Ball's Womb Red, with my carefully-curated collection of normal-person objects and pictures. And my red boxes. Most importantly, it has a nice, strong bolt. He can't get at me in here.
It's the toilet, Matt.
No-one will notice, because I'm wearing my nice blue suit just the colour of my eyes.
But you are sitting on the toilet, Matt.
That's because it is kind of cosy in here. Oh, oh, is it my turn now?
 


Health Secretary, I put it to you that the majority of people can't stay at home because, as the TUC have estimated, the average worker will lose £690 per week.
 
Well, Andrew, we have got, look, some of the most generous support schemes in the EntireWorld. And most people qualify for full payment of their salaries.
 
No, Health Secretary, 7 out of 10 people don't. 
 
Well, Andrew, those one third can have financial support in our financiallyveryGenerousSchemes.
 
A word about your testing scheme, Health Secretary - are these the same lateral flow tests that didn't work in Liverpool? 
 
Andrew, the same lateral flow tests that worked effectively in Liverpool, Yes.
 
In Liverpool, 60% of positive tests were missed.
 
No
 
Yes
 
No
 
 Health Secretary, I have just read you your own scientists saying the exact opposite of what you have just said.



And having wiped the floor with the Health Secretary, who is following the guidance to stay on the toilet, I will turn now to Sir Keir Starmer


 I don't care what the question is, Andrew,  the answer is that it's a thin deal.
No, no. no, it is a thin deal.
Look, I want this to succeed and it is a thin deal. It is thin. But it is better than nothing. 
It is not what was promised. It is a thin treaty.
..................................................

 Contest Prize Part Two: Mr Bungalow Bill has requested something about the Bracing Isles. 
 

 The trick is to get the windscreen wipers going and headlights on before driving across the Barriers.
wave breaking on the windscreen
When there's a severe weather warning, the police drive down to St Mary's Village and physically close the Barriers. If you are stuck on the wrong side, you just have to make other plans or sit in your car until the Barriers are re-opened. This is why property prices on the linked south islands are considerably lower than on Orkney Mainland. The police don't always get there in time and intrepid motorists, wanting to go to work or get home, venture across, risking massive damage. Those waves are heavy, man. And carry great rocks which are dumped on your car roof or smash your windscreen. When a wave drops on you, you can't see anything other than a world of noisy water. You are unlikely to drive off the Barrier and into the sea because there are low barriers on either side of the roadway, but you can be pushed into it. 
Here is one of the Barriers on a calm day:

to the right of the barrier  you can see the rusting remains of the Block ships that were the defence to the entrance to Scapa Flow.

Scapa Flow is one of the largest sheltered harbours in the world and home  to the Grand Fleet from 1914 - handy for engaging with the German Fleet based in the Baltic. There are four islands on the eastern side of Scapa Flow: South Ronaldsay, Burray, Lamb Holm and Glimps Holm.The narrow passages between the islands were blocked by sinking old ships. At the start of WWII further blockships were sunk and submarine nets were deployed, but were inadequate in the face of intelligence gathered by German spies masquerading as  holiday-making ministers staying locally. The ministers took out a boat daily, together with rods and keep nets. Whilst ostensibly and ostentatiously fishing, they surreptitiously depth-sounded the entrance to the Flow. This information was added to hundreds and hundreds of aerial photographs taken by low-flying German planes, which overlapped to form a complete, massive picture of the Flow and the surrounding land. The definition of these aerial photos was so precise and detailed that it showed Orkney farm-wives hanging out their washing.
On 14 October 1939, the German U-Boat, U-47, under Gunther Prien, made its way past the blockships at high tide and torpedoed the 23 year old HMS Royal Oak lying at anchor in Scapa Flow. The ship had been notorious in 1928 when her senior officers were  court-martialled, following the "Royal Oak Mutiny" - which started when Rear-Admiral Bernard Collard and two senior officers, Captain Kenneth Dewar and Commander Henry Daniel, disagreed over the band at the ship's wardroom dance and became a bitter feud. Dewar and Daniel accused Collard of "vindictive fault-finding" and openly humiliating and insulting them before their crew; in return, Collard countercharged them with failing to follow orders and treating him "worse than a midshipman".  Commander-in-Chief Admiral Sir Roger Keyes removed all three from their posts and sent them back to England, on the eve of a major naval exercise, which he was obliged to postpone, causing rumours to fly around the fleet that the Royal Oak had experienced a mutiny. The story was picked up by the press worldwide,  reaching such proportions as to involve the King, who summoned First Lord of the Admiralty William Bridgeman for an explanation.
For their letters of complaint, Dewar and Daniel were controversially charged with writing "subversive documents". Both were court-martialled, found guilty and severely reprimanded, leading Daniel to resign from the Navy. Collard was criticised for the excesses of his conduct by the press and in Parliament, and on being denounced by Bridgeman as "unfitted to hold further high command", was forcibly retired from service.  One consequence of the embarassing, widely publicised and lampooned affair was an undertaking from the Admiralty to review the means by which naval officers might bring complaints against the conduct of their superiors. The first Grievance Policy.

The  Royal Oak was at anchor in the Flow when she was torpedoed. Of her complement of 1,234 men and boys, 835 were killed that night or died later of their wounds. The shock resulted in rapid changes to dockland security and the construction of the Churchill Barriers around Scapa Flow.

The wreck of Royal Oak, a designated war grave, lies almost upside down in 100 feet of water with her hull 16 feet beneath the surface. In an annual ceremony, Royal Navy divers place a White Ensign underwater at her stern. Unauthorised divers are prohibited from approaching the wreck under the Protection of Military Remains Act 1986.

Within a month of the sinking of the Royal Oak, Winston Churchill visited Orkney and ordered that work begin on the construction of four permanent barriers.
 
  To form the bases over 250,000 tons of broken rock were dropped from overhead cableways into waters up to 59 feet deep. The bases were then covered with 66,000 concrete blocks in five-tonne and ten-tonne sizes. The five-ton blocks were laid on the core, and the ten-tonne blocks were arranged on the sides in a random pattern to act as wave-breaks. Material was quarried on Orkney, and concrete blocks were cast on an industrial scale on the islands before being brought to the cableways by a network of railways.
 
1300 Italian prisoners of war worked on the construction.The prisoners were divided between three camps, 700 in two camps on Burray and 600 at Camp 60 on Lamb Holm. These men also constructed The Italian Chapel. As the use of POW labour for War Effort works is prohibited under the Geneva Convention, the works were justified as ‘improvements to communications’ to the southern Orkney Islands.The work began in May 1940 and was completed by September 1944. The Churchill Barriers were formally opened by the first Lord of the Admiralty on 12th May 1945, four days after the end of World War II in Europe.
 
  There's a nice little fictionalised account of the construction of the Churchill Causeways by Philip Paris, called The Italian Chapel.

Talk about bracing - here's mr ishmael writing on the 24th December 2016.
Storm Barbara is battering us, a bit, presently; I think it's still Barbara, although it might be some other bastard;  I guess it's just the ongoing commodification of everything, this baby-talking of Life itself;  I preferred that Beaufort Scale  stuff - Force 10, Gale Force, Storm Force, Hurricane Force and so on but giving storms names probably makes the fuckwit newsreaders feel more important. We have weathered worse and don't usually complain but where once I might have charged out and tried to minimise ongoing property damage, now I just let it rip.  This is just an old shed, down the side of the house, collapsing outside my window:


it is used for storing rakes and flower pots and I'd rather let it just blow into the fields than try to go and lash it down. I'll use the timber for something, even for firewood and I'll build a brick one, next time, breeze blocks, anyway.  I say I but I mean some person masquerading as a builder, the world is full of them, even here, in Arcadia; a rusty Transit and a miniature cement mixer doth a builder make, those and the shameless cheek of the Devil.

We are past the darkest times, now, and the good Earth tilts lightwards;  the daffodils are already peeping through;  last time I counted there were about 5,000 of them, brightening and measuring my days,  there are a few hundred tulips, I suppose, never counted them, and they don't seem to spread as rampantly as the daffs and even though they come later their more exotic colourings - blues and purples and pinks and blacks - define and emphasise the warming Spring.

I love that piece from A Shropshire Lad, about the cherry blossom, and find myself more and more watchful of the seasons, their punctuation of my time.  

Loveliest of trees, the cherry now


 

THE BOOK PAGE, MUSTN'T RUSH  THE GORSE 27/4/10

Somebody pressed a book on me, a new hardback. You'll like this, ishmael, it's right up your street. It was by Dan Brown, the Da Vinci millionaire and franchisee and  Jesus, it was desperate stuff.

I had to read it, the donor was a fellow expat and you can't really say Thanks, most kind but Fuck off, this is shit, I know it's shit before I open it, I'd rather read a bus ticket. They are fragile, these expat relationships and slights have consequences.  The dinner parties,   for instance, lost souls, huddled together against  sourfaced Presbyteria and yokel incompetence would stop happening and one might decide, as do some,  to take up  goats and the accordion and start speaking in tongues, pompous and judgemental, about Quality of life and  about vehicular air-conditioning being nothing short of  grandchild betrayal; some  join the amateur dramatics societies and take up furtive wife-swapping and stagey exhibitionism.  Better not risk the delicate  status quo, better to read two hundred pages of occult-nouvelle tripe and keep on good terms with  acquaintances,  pressed by shared migrant despair, to each other's dining tables. Read the damn thing. Just look on it like a weekend spent wrapped in a cardy, at Mrs Dale's queer diary, reading his exclusive, gossipy burblings or at Col von Fawkes's, learning about how great capitalism is, how not taxing the rich is good, actually,  for the poor,  no, really, it is; about how wonderful, strong and vibrant is the Irish economy and how Codger McCain is going to romp the US election; there is no shortage, even in the massive, rambling cyberlibrary, of ill-informed shit to read, nor of contentedly ill-informed readers. Dan Brown can't be worse than that.

But bus tickets, I knew a guy one time, said that very thing, almost. Said that he couldn't even contemplate doing a sitdown toilet  unless he had something  to read.  Anything would do, anything was better than nothing,  even said he'd managed some good number twos by reading, in the cruel absence of anything else, his rent book and on one occasion a 'bus ticket which he'd found,  rummaging in his round-the-ankles trouser pocket, as he sat fruitlessly on the loo, despairingly, slammed shut constipated, not by diet or intestinal mischief but  by the absence of words on paper, the 'bus ticket was his laxatif instantane his thundering, flatulent deliverance,  although he preferred the Sun.

I don't think it's  a  fetish, bordering on LiberalCopraDemocratism, just a ritual  but then, as BB King says,  one man's  ritual is another man's  fetish, just ask FatherMcNonceULike, down at the Pope Nazi  Church of The Holy Infant Sodomisers. No, reading in the loo, it's sort of basic yooman rights with me, you know, without something to read I might never poo again, have to cut me open and fit a stoma bag, colostomised for want of something to read. I just wouldn't go in there without  there being a sufficient supply of reading material - Viz magazine, with a magnifying glass to read the speech balloons, some political biography, some head stuff, Zen or Tao or Ching and sometimes some fiction, although less and less.  I remember battering my way almost  through The Magus by John Fowles, one of those serious, irritable, beardy English novelistbastards  with a deep, brown voice and one of his characters saying Why on Earth would I read fiction,  it's all made up, maybe half a  page per hundred containing some insight I hadn't already seen-into myself, the rest of it drivel, words to that effect, anyway, and even though the character saying them was made-up and in a novel, they stayed with me,  a sort of a contradiction, a Medium is the Message moment; fiction, therefore, is not the first thing I would reach for, my head is full of my own, mad what-if and if-only and maybe-someday fiction, what do I want with somebody else's; in fact, most of the time, I think How Dare There Be Writers ?  I mean people who, that's all they do, is write books, poems, plays, you know, made-up stuff, and call it a job, work; Jeanette Winterface, Martin Teeth. I mentioned, before, that when I worked in a library, I met, lunched with a few writers, shifty, idle bastards, they were, good for fuck all. They need a good smack in the mouth and  a few days digging holes in the road. It's alright people writing stuff down, I love it,  levels my head and eases my mind but, you know, just think of any professional writer you've ever heard on Radio Four  or BBC2 and they'll be intolerable arseholes.

I saw that AS Byatt once, not sure what it was, may have been Lord Bragg's drooling, groupie, teeth-and-hair South Bank Show. 

Byatt was talking about her modus operandi, her creative process, she has a hubby-gofer called Peter, and he's an absolute treasure, rather like  a  little woman or little man, who does for her, drives her about the place, a housekeeper/chauffeur/confidante/whipping boy, she simply couldn't do what she does without him, ghastly. She and Peter were up in Yorkshire,  reee-surching  some load of pretentious, dreary old shite, some hokum set, where else, but in academe, which  she was dreaming up for her  readers and they'd done whatever it was they went to do, her local colour ree-surch,  and were on the way back to Hampstead  or the  South of France, when she realised that in some descriptive paragraph she'd Rushed the Gorse, hadn't quite got it down right, the Gorse - gorse, for overseas readers, is a tough, prickly shrub with yellow flowers which grows wildly in abundance, particularly in the North of the UK, it's like locoweed, only you can't smoke it - simply mustn't Rush the Gorse, crucial to the telling of the tale, it was and so she made Peter, the absolute treasure, take her  back so's she could sit and Be With the Gorse.  Shouting at the radio, I was; hopefully is a fucking adverb, ya mad, frigid old trout.
 

 Byatt says this of her creativity:

       " I think of writing simply in terms of pleasure. It's the most important thing in my life, making things. Much as I love my husband and my children, I love them only because I am the person who makes these things. I, who I am, is the person that has the project of making a thing. Well, that's putting it pompously – but constructing. I do see it in sort of three-dimensional structures. And because that person does that all the time, that person is able to love all these people. "  ( trans: I am the fucking breadwinner.)
 

Driving back to Yorkshire, to do the Gorse-describing quality  control,   I woulda fucking killed her. And if I ever see her on the side of a Highlands road, Being With The Gorse, I will.

 These people see their lives in chapters, italicising the everyday. It's all pretence, artifice, conceit and its not as though a) there isn't already plenty to read and b) plenty of other shit that needs doing far more urgently than book writing. Or poems. Especially poems. That Roger McGough, what's he like,  primly, pompously  poetry-pleasing, behind his Radio Four microphone, when, once, he was a popstar, of sorts, drinking a drink, a drink to Lily the Pink, the Pink, the Pink. Silly old Prat.

In  the '60s US prison film, Cool Hand Luke, the redneck captain of the guard, having battered Luke, Paul Newman, to the ground, says jocularly, What We Have Here Is A Failure to Communicate

and I always feel like Luke, down  on the floor, bruised,  when I hear writers twittering tyrannically on about their fucking writing, like they were jailers, insead of layabouts, and we had to understand exactly, exactly what they meant, before we could be free, had to delight in their metaphors, gasp at their narrative twists. If you need to go on about it for years afterwards, then you  obviously didn't write it properly in the first place. Rather have toothache, me, than read Ian McEwan and hearing him talk about how he Does It, the writing, well........

My young friend, stanislav, the Polish plumber, has written extensively of  the crippling snobbery which surrounds the act of communicating by writing on the Internet, of the Apostrophe Jihadists, who, spitefully and stupidly, like Mr PTB's cruel and vicious dons,  stomping the vitality from their students,  would dismiss an enthusiastically expressed, original thought, merely because its thinker was improperly or not at all schooled in punctuation.  There was a blogger, currently absent and much missed,  Dennis, the cruel, bell-ringing pedant, who, a precise and elegant writer, himself, could not tolerate  what he saw as the deliberate, lazy shortcomings of lesser writers, misplacing or misunderstanding a colon, claiming, somewhat dictatorially,  that poor grammar invalidated everything wherein it appeared,  that it was incomprehensible unless grammatically flawless; utter bollocks, of course.

In the case of Dan Brown, though, I just had to read  it in order to stay on good terms with my fellow expat. Scotland is the best part of England but you need to keep close to other English -  those not gone goat-native - for its magic to work continuously and so I put it on the shelf in the loo, next to Viz and Lao Tzu's The Art of War  and Zen in the Art of Archery, between Imelda Blair's Big Book About Myself and Barack Obama's Big Book About Himself - Obama can write beautifully, if self-obsessedly; Imelda does complaining, just as you'd expect, her life is a complaint. And Dan Brown? He says of himself:

"I do something very intentional and specific in these books. And that is to blend fact and fiction in a very modern and efficient style, to tell a story. There are some people who understand what I do, and they sort of get on the train and go for a ride and have a great time, and there are other people who should probably just read somebody else." 

Yes, that's right.

.................................................................

 Mr ishmael's essays today are:

Storm Barbara                                24th December 2016.

The Book Page: mustn't rush the Gorse   27th April  2010

The Health Secretary and the Leader of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition contributed their own words and toilet. Honest, Not Invent.

 ...............................................

 Honest, Not Invent is an anthology of essays by stanislav and mr ishmael. It is  available from lulu.com  and  is listed by both Blackwells and the Book Depository. Lulu assures me that it is shortly to be available through Amazon.
 
To buy a copy:
please register an account with Lulu first.  This will save you a couple of quid, as going straight into the links provided below seems to make paypal think it's ok to charge in dollars, and apply their own conversion rate, which will put the price up slightly for a UK buyer.  Once the new account is set up, follow one of the links (to either paperback or hardback) or type "Honest, Not Invent" into the Lulu Bookstore search box.  If you follow a link, a pop-up box asks for age confirmation - simply set the date to (say) 1 January 1960, and proceed.  If you type the title, the anthology will not appear as a search result until the "show explicit content" box (found at the bottom left by scrolling down) has been checked.  You may also see the age verification box, as above, at this point.
Honest, Not Invent is available in paperback or hardback.
Link for Hard Back : 
Link for Paper Back : 
There's a 15% discount for a couple of days: with the voucher code = TREAT15 in the coupon box, which takes 15% off the price before postage.  If this code has expired by the time you reach this point, try a google search for "Lulu.com voucher code" and see what comes up.   



Thursday, 7 January 2021

Mr Bungalow Bill's prize

 If the house was on fire and I could grab a couple of books probably the first among them would be How To Build Shaker Furniture, by Thos. Moser, Sterling Publishing, New York, 1977.


I remember, in the 1990s, I was enthusing about  a  then-new claw-hammer to an antique furniture trade  colleague;  it was the same configuration as a normal claw hammer



 but it was the weight of a pin hammer.


great for knocking-in a couple of pins and sinking the heads with the flat side but you cannot use it for pin removal

 I liked this hammer so much that I bought a score of them, some I have given as gifts, several I still have stashed, in my desk, just in case.  I used to make loads of bookshelves/cases and the backboards required scores  of panel pins, many of which would bend as you banged them in;  what I'd have to do was put down the ordinary pin hammer and pick-up  a pair of pincers to extract the bent pin and then start again; the ordinary pin hammer has no claw and I couldn't use a proper claw-hammer because it was too heavy, and I was delighted to find this smaller, lighter version. Hmmm, said Tony, 's'appened to you.  What's happened to me? Oh, you reach an age when you  get poetic about tools.

Tony was correct for  not only was I squeezing into my own daily reality a belated if haphazard appreciation of  tool anthropology and sociology, I was also purchasing  a more formal understanding - books about tools and procedures and one day, in Victorian Llandudno, North Wales, I came across Moser's book which was ostensibly a selection of drawings and cutting lists for the making of a slew of Shaker pieces but was more importantly  a tour-de-force in technical writing of the spiritual kind. 

I don't like Shaker furniture much 
 

and there would be a long, cold day in Hell before I attempted making some but Moser's writing was and remains a rare treasure;  here he is in his chapter, Materials.


A Covenenant with Wood.
A craftsman is but a handmaiden to his materials.  The inherent qualities of wood limit to a certain extent the cabinetmaker's choices.  Unlike plastic or rubber, concrete or steel, wood has a mind of its own.  It is not easily bent and when bent wants to return in time to its original form.  It is easy to break along its grain, yet it will withstand considerable shearing force.  It warps without provocation and swells and contracts with the seasons as though it had entered a conspiracy with the calendar to loosen chair rungs in the winter and swell drawers shut in the summer.  Wood cracks mindlessly, can shed a finish with disastrous effect, refuses to be cut from north to south,  yet yields submissivley from east to west. It splinters, bows, cups, shrinks, loosens, swells, dents, cracks and changes colour.  Yet to many of us wood remains the most pleasing of all natural materials, for in the richness and variety of its grain is to be found nature's texture incarnate.  Wood is a kind of a bridge between man and that organic mass of growing things he calls Mother Earth. Wood is a renewable resource which has given us warmth and shelter and provided unrivaled joy to the eye and to the touch since long before recorded time.  Along with water and stone it is our most fundamental material - without it our world would be an alien place.  In wood man fashioned his first tool, in wood he built the ladder with which he  has ascended over the millennia. It literally surrounds us from the cradle to the coffin.  Wood may well be called the foundation of civilisation.

When the craftsman commits himself to work in wood, he becomes a party in a contract.  If he sensitive to his material, he enters into a kind of covenant in which he acknowledges a certain subservience to his medium.  He agrees (1)  to come to understand, not in a cognitive way,  but through feelings, the nature of wood: (2) to admit at the very beginning that there is no such thing as perfection in wood, for in spite of all his efforts there will always be some blemish, some telltale error, recorded in the wood though known only to the builder; (3) in laying-out and forming joints, to anticipate the inevitable movement  that will occur long after the work is finished.


Although my primary school teacher would chide Moser for his failings in grammar and punctuation, these are knowings and sentiments rarely expressed  in technical books, certainly not in the current spate of appalling wordworking magazines and partworks, none of which are worth the glossy paper on which they are printed.

It turns out that Moser, as well as running a respected cabinetmakers business 

taught communication at a New England university and as far as I'm concerned the drawings of Shaker furniture are as irrelevant as are now the Shakers, themselves.  Moser writes about handtools, powertools, machinery, about fixtures, adhesives, abrasives  and finishes as only an expert can, few can combine craft and communication as enthusiastically (Greek, filled with God) as does Moser. Although the book is rich in photographs of sturdy, often vintage tools and machines, Moser, as did  the late Fred Dibnah, offers pencil drawings, too, of his subjects;  maybe there were no cameras to hand,  there was no computer-aided design, maybe he just likes doing the drawings, there is something magical about drawing a project in advance and seeing how close comes the finished article.

There has been  a lot of technical writing which is excellent;  I have all sorts of compendia on how How To Run An Efficient Household, Manage A Garden and Compose A Letter of Condolence; mainly these are from before the Second World War, often Victorian, punctilious, reeking with snobbery and etiquiette  yet miracles of concision, expertise and style  but even as late as the 'sixties, publishers such as Readers Digest were producing well-written, comprehensive guides to home maintainance and the Automobile Association printed useful and understandable guides to car maintainance  but all of these  date from before before and the industrial dominance of Japan brought badly translated manuals and brochures which were no more than gibberish.  These days, finding someone who not only knows  but can also readily and pleasingly communicate that of which they speak is a rare experience.
 
Comments (a selection)
 
Bungalow Bill said...

That writing from Moser is lovely. It's what we've said before: there is little craft now, no touch, no awareness of what may be brought forth from apprenticeship and patience and a humble understanding of ourselves in the world.  10 December 2014 at 21:52  

call me ishmael said... I am too old to be anyone's apprentice but if I wasn't I'd be Moser's. Don't know if he's still alive, actually, but he'll be around while I am. 10 December 2014 at 22:11 

mongoose said...One day a goodly few years back when the lad was wee his grandad bought him a kid's toolkit thing with a few bits of wood. And therein was this maybe half-size-and-a-bit claw hammer. To cut a long story short, it is now my mini claw hammer. I'll be sure to mention it all, Mr I, next time I'm at confession. 
 call me ishmael said... 
 mr mongoose, order Moser's book; if it was written for one person in the world that person would be you, the Zen of engineering, the poetry of the Creator, the skill of hands and eyes, too soon coffin dust; the futility of us all, stumbling about, trying to find reason, make sense with our shavings and scrapings, our sawings and sandings, our frettings and fixings; our stains and varnishes and waxes. Was it WH Auden said, Embellishment, all is embellishment? He was wrong, whoever he was, embellishment comes at the very end. At least, it used to. 
 mongoose said...I will gladly seek out the book. I like the Shaker chairs but I have tried making chairs more than once over the years and I am crap at it. Firewood. Patience and precision and more feeling for the material than a mudplugging tinker possesses may be the problem.  
 call me ishmael said... 
It has always been one of my self-exculpatory maxims - the man who never made a mistake never made anything. 
Every time I look at a chair I think, how does that work, for up to a point, the more weight you put on it, the firmer become its joints.Maybe the way to understand chair making is to take a mallet and completely knock one apart and put it back together again, with hot fish glue from the glue pot and inner tubes. 
The first known chair was a joint stool, a piece of fallen tree trunk with three short branches protruding which, inverted, could be sat upon, raising man's arse from the cold, hard floor, one of those techno-nature collisions which have shaped us, the rolled log led to the wheel, the rock led to the hammer, the jawbone to the saw and so on.
 mongoose said... 
"How a chair works?" Jeez, Mr I, we'll be here for weeks with that one. 
It doesn't help, of course, that my first foray was to fix my old windsor rocking chair which had started to explode. Instead of tracing the trouble back, I tried to kill it with lots of glue and a big fuck-off clamp. A chair that rocks being the perfect way of testing the sympathies of the chair within, this did not go well. It took me a while to work out that - everything being physics - the clamp was working against me and just pushing the problem down the line, and hiding it a bit more effectively. But what can you do with the slow-witted but wait, eh? For a further while then all was kept under control with a dressing gown cord - rigging for chairs - and by screwing around with that we got the stresses evened up and finally we had peace. I then crept up and glued the bugger while it wasn't looking. Cord back on to dry and there we are.  
I now often clamp stuff up with parcel straps - self-correcting and self-evening clamps for butchers. You heard it here last.
  blackholesunset said... 
Wood is a beautiful material. An entire secondary school woodworking class produced only one item, a picture frame, which I still have. It is not especially well made, yet I would not chose to part with it. It is almost certainly the only thing I do still posses which dates from that period.
 call me ishmael said... 
That's how it goes, mr mongoose. I used to give chairs to my old friend Colin, who did some work for me, Just fix that stretcher, eh? I'd see him a few days later and the chair was in pieces, completely disassembled; Colin, I only wanted the stretcher doing. Never made any difference to Colin. If it was a chair it had to come apart. I grew to love him for it. 
We have a two hundred year-old Windsor - actually Lancashire, elm, with a fiddle back - armchair, one of the slats came out but I just managed to force it back in and there it stays, without glue, God know what would've happened if I'd glued that one and not the others, whole thing be in splinters, I should think. 12 December 2014 at 10:08 
 call me ishmael said... 
mr bhs; consider yourself lucky to have that woodworking memento. It took me years, to get those souvenirs, and I don't know how they slipped away from me. I have nothing treasured from before, nothing.Delete
Blogger call me ishmael said... 
 It is an everyday story of grammar school folk,  of assuming our nascent mastery of all Jack's trades, if he can do it we can do it. Often, that is the case - I can't do plastering but I can lay floorboards and make skirting boards better than most builders/floorers; I can't do lead flashing but I hired an aerial platform, went up forty feet and did; that was twelve years ago and the chimney-stack is still as sound as a pound, needs must. A former jumbo-pilot I knew taught himself plumbing and electrics and he now does it at genius level. On the other hand, we are currently replacing thirty-odd rotten wooden windows with uPVC and using a proper tradesman; he knows exactly what he's doing, not only how but why, I could never do that, well, maybe I could after a few years at it but not off the top of my head. 
I don't know which came first, the decline in trade skills among so-called tradesmen or the ascent of Barry Bucknellism - DIY - but what I do know is that both of the old houses which we have owned have been mutilated and endangered by the dab-hand of DIY. We have a sparks coming in the New Year to do a partial re-wire and change the boards, then, after twelve years, we may have undone the damage caused by the previous owner, a Master Mariner with whom I would never set sail. 
It is a big subject, to which we should return, DIY, renovation,loft- conversion and extension; the Awful Coming of the Knockers-Through. 12 December 2014 at 10:40 Delete
Anonymous 

THE DIY PAGE  1st September 2013

I did a project, did a project? completed a project, while I was away. I was as rough as a bear's arse and so it took me ages and ages. Would've been a week, not so long ago, took me four months and I'm still not finished. I have already stripped and polished a couple of the floors - they had come-up really well, considering they're two hundred years old, and there was only the drawing room left to do. I'll piss it, I though, I'm good at this. And I am good at it. No, I am, it's all my years of staining and polishing furniture and it's also my mind. I've mentioned it before - I have a hedge-trimmer's mind. I must have half a mile of hedge, maybe more but I can just start at one end, with a pair of clippers and work my way to the other end; it becomes a meditation,  I am completely lost, out of it,  and yet I swear I look at every fucking leaf and twig and decide whether or where to cut it.  Well, this used to be true and I still have that mind - my daughter used to describe such feats of endurance or accomplishment  - it might be hedgetrimming it might be driving non-stop from one end of the country to the other -  as Yes, Dad but that's you, you're.......you're just....HARDCORE - but I also now have either fibromyalgia or compression of the spinal cord or both or something completely else and I am not the man I was.  The spirit is willing but the flesh is weak.

But I couldn't piss this one.  Normally I seal the room up and just get down on my hands and knees with a flexible drum sander - the type that fits onto a normal drill and I sit there, mask on, in a blinding cloud of dust, meditating on maybe three, maybe four at a time metre-lengths of board, normally takes a couple of days.  You have to get into the corners with -  I use a Makita random orbital sander -  but a flat sander or a detail sander will do just as well.  I will then go over the entire floor with a fine or worn-out sanding drum and finally with four-zero wire wool And then I Hoover and brush and sweep and Hoover again and then I wipe it all over with white spirit and then,  brushing and mini-hoovering as I go,  I apply Van Dyke Brown crystal stain, smoothly and uniformly.  The Van Dyke is roasted walnut kernels and it gives you as pale or as dark a brown stain as you want, just mixed with water and only costs pennies , literally.  You can buy it online from Wood Finishes, I think.com.  It's about twelve pounds a kilo but you use it in spoonsful, a better product and stupidly cheaper than all those Colron tins of rubbish.

But this time, when I lifted the carpet I found linoleum or oilcoth, looked to be about 1900 - 1920 and it didn't lift easily, it didn't lift at all, in fact and where I could see the adhesive it looked like pure evil, like a thin concrete.  I might've removed it but it would've killed me.  I had done a smaller area of something similar in this house but Oh, the work;  I couldn't tackle this and so I decided I'd lay another floor on top of the existing one.

I measured it up and I needed forty-five four and a half metre lengths.  Four and a half metres is one big long, heavy awkward bastard of a board, just getting them in the house was murder and then they had to go into the library, halfway up the stairs, twist the fucker around and then feed it into the drawing room.  On a good day I managed to fit three boards.  Despite them being tongued and grooved, the floor was as crooked as the government  and I had to screw-in blocks and use sash cramps to pull each board up to the next and then screw it down  with some of those modern self-sinking screws.

Like many blokes,  I had been fooling myself that power tools spared your joints the wearn'n'tear of hand tools.  It's nonsense, they don't, you are always fighting the torque of the machine - if you just hold a powered screwdrive loosely in your hand and squeeze the trigger it will instantly spin your wrist almost through three-hundred and sixty degrees, and it is trying to do that every single time you use it.  I couldn't possibly sink five hundred screws by hand but instead I ditched the big powerdriver with battery weighing about ten pounds and bought this kit, from Makita, and I sunk the five hundred three inch screws on one charge,  you are still fighting the torque but the reduced weight and the precision of the motor and gearing make things a bit easier, too late for me, now, to make any difference but if you are thinking of getting into major projects I would recommend buying this before anything else.

While I was at it I thought I'd partially board   the walls and that meant resiteing all the sockets, renewing the skirting boards  and doubling up the dado rail so I could tuck the tops of the boards behind.  They were shit anyway,  the skirting boards; no more than 
three inches deep. These are better.