Sunday 22 August 2010

STRAIGHT SIMON HUGHES, THANKS BE TO ALLAH, MISSING FROM THE PREVIOUS POST, A HUNDRED DAYS OF SODOM

7 comments:

yardarm said...

Don`t know much about Peter Tatchell but didn`t he actually have the guts to try and arrest Mugabe and got a severe kicking for his trouble ?

If so that would make him more of a man than that soapy, smarmy, patronising, vote grubbing oxygen thief Hughes.

call me ishmael said...

That's right. He got similar, if less severe treatment - assaulted - by Portillo's goons when he approached him, on a London street, about a gay issue, cuddly Michael, coewardly, vicious cunt.

Elby the Beserk said...

Cunt. Headline seeker. Whatever you think of Thatcher, check out her demolition of a spluttering Hughes here, in her last speech to the House, a slap in the face for Lefties till the end of time, and one which cunts like Balls should be made to watch on repeat till the end of time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okHGCz6xxiw

Elby the Beserk said...

Thatchell has his points, but does seem to think he has the right to out those who don't want out.


Which makes him a cunt as well, IMHO. What fucking business is it of his, another person's sexuality?

call me ishmael said...

Being a full-time activist and scribbler seems a peculiar vanity and I think PT is wrong-headed on much, especially on the age of consent but I believe his outings are of people who, whilst in, pass discriminatory legislation or preach discriminatory sermons and who, in my view, as I have said repeatedly, most recently in the disclaimer on the last post, simply cannot have their cock and eat it, or is it cake, Michael? There is a less compassionate, sterner view, that people who pontificate on marriage and the family being the building block of society whilst barebacking around Westminster are contemptible and deserve everything they get. There will be amny such, Mr Murdoch will knopw who they are but will maintain their privacy. And obedience.

Duncan, Smith, Brown, the Treasury lesbianb, these people are fucking awful but at least they are not hypocritical in the revoltiong Hughesian fashion.

Oaten is a case in point, gay or otherwise, posturing about how he was going to crack down on prostitutes whilst himself a regular client, Laws of the Treasury, I mean, c'mon, fiddling his housing benefit in a way which would've got a single mother jailed and somehow it's OK because it was part of the maintainance of his secret gay identity. Not much of an example to we, the poor and wicked.
Sorry, the Thatcher link doesn't work, by the way, mr e.

call me ishmael said...

No, it worked after a while, mr e. Jesus, that's nightmare stuff, all of them, all of them, a pox on them all.

mongoose said...

Always been a sermonising cunt that Hughes, Mr Elby. He is beyond saving now.

The simple answer to both Maggie's need to create wealth and Hughes' bollocks about the gap is to take poor people out of income tax altogether. "The income tax threshold is hereby raised to £12,000. This will cost X billion pounds and will be funded by an increase on the basic rate of Y pence in the pound." Poverty largely erased, poverty trap removed, wealth gap addressed where it needs to be addressed - at the bottom, work incentives increased. Problem solved. Not a cat's chance of anything so sensible happening, of course.